Evidence and the hierarchy of mathematical theories

Abstract

It is a well-known fact of mathematical logic, by now developed in considerable detail, that formalized mathematical theories can be ordered by relative interpretability, and the "strength" of a theory is indicated by where it stands in this ordering. Mutual interpretability is an equivalence relation, and what I call an ordering is a partial ordering modulo this equivalence. Of the theories that have been studied, the natural theories belong to a linearly ordered subset of this ordering

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-09

Downloads
66 (#247,251)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Parsons
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Finitism.W. W. Tait - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (9):524-546.
Sur le platonisme dans les mathématiques.Paul Bernays - 1935 - L’Enseignement Mathematique 34:52--69.
Gödel's conceptual realism.Donald A. Martin - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):207-224.
Eighty years of foundational studies.Hao Wang - 1958 - Dialectica 12 (3‐4):466-497.

View all 7 references / Add more references