Value, property and unjust enrichment: trusts of traceable proceeds

Abstract

Restitution lawyers commonly speak of the 'transfer' of value; this is misconceived. Values are realised, not transferred, only property rights are transferred. This realisation distinctly illuminates the relationship between the law of restitution and the law of tracing, strongly suggesting that trusts of traceable proceeds are not examples of restitutionary entitlements which reverse unjust enrichments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The future reach of the disembodied will.Eric Rakowski - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (1):91-130.
Corrective justice.Ernest Joseph Weinrib - 2012 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Unjust enrichment, rights and value.Ben McFarlane - 2012 - In Donal Nolan & Andrew Robertson (eds.), Rights and private law. Portland, Oregon: Hart.
Rights and value in rescission : some implications for unjust enrichment.Elise Bant - 2012 - In Donal Nolan & Andrew Robertson (eds.), Rights and private law. Portland, Oregon: Hart.
Storytelling in the law of unjust enrichment.Tang Hang Wu - 2009 - In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The goals of private law. Portland, Or.: Hart.
Justice and the Initial Acquisition of Property.John T. Sanders - 1987 - Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 10 (2):367-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-21

Downloads
29 (#554,418)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references