Is it True What She Says About Tarski?

Philosophy 54 (207):98-98 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a paper ‘Is it True What They Say About Tarski?’, Dr Susan Haack explicitly denies the truth of an implicit assertion of mine, by writing ‘… Tarski does not present his theory as a correspondence theory’. My reply is to quote two brief passages from Tarski's work.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100024906

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is It True What Haack Says about Tarski?Richard C. Jennings - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (240):237 - 243.
Tarski's definition of truth and the correspondence theory.Herbert Keuth - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):420-430.
Is It True What They Say about Tarski?Susan Haack - 1976 - Philosophy 51 (197):323 - 336.
Are There Model-Theoretic Logical Truths that Are not Logically True?Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2008 - In Douglas Patterson (ed.), New essays on Tarski and philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 340-368.
Tarski’s Convention T: condition beta.John Corcoran - forthcoming - South American Journal of Logic 1 (1).
Towards transfinite type theory: rereading Tarski’s Wahrheitsbegriff.Iris Loeb - 2014 - Synthese 191 (10):2281-2299.
Was Tarski's Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism?Greg Frost-Arnold - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (4):265-280.
Tarski's physicalism.Richard L. Kirkham - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (3):289-302.
On Tarski on models.Timothy Bays - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1701-1726.
Modal Tarski algebras.S. Celani - 2005 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:113-126.
Carnap's Contribution to Tarski's Truth.Monika Gruber - 2015 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3 (10).
Tarski, Frege and the Liar Paradox.Sloman Aaron - 1971 - Philosophy 46 (176):133-.
Tarski's definition and truth-makers.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):57-76.
Lies, half-truths, and falsehoods about Tarski’s 1933 “liar” antinomies.John Corcoran & Joaquin Miller - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):140-141.
correct provided the mathematical axioms of the metalanguage are true–and that proviso uses the very notion of truth that some people claim Tarski completely explained for us! Why do I say this? Well, remember that Tarski's criterion of adequacy is that all the T-sentences must be theorems of the metalanguage. If the metalanguage is incorrect and it can be incorrect with.Comments on Charles Parsons - 2012 - In Maria Baghramian (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
66 (#247,426)

6 months
20 (#132,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Tarski and Primitivism About Truth.Jamin Asay - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13:1-18.
Taking Simmel Seriously in Evolutionary Epistemology.Martin Coleman - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):55-74.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The establishment of scientific semantics.Alfred Tarski - 2006 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (2):181-188.
Is It True What They Say about Tarski?Susan Haack - 1976 - Philosophy 51 (197):323 - 336.

Add more references