Comments on Sosa's “relevant alternatives, contextualism included”

Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):67-72 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is much I agree with in Sosa’s paper. His discussion of Stine and Peirce is quite useful; so too his discussion of Dretske in Appendix II. A further issue he focuses on concerns how Contextualists are to give full endorsement to the knowledge-claims of ordinary subjects. Just saying, metalinguistically, that.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
161 (#119,836)

6 months
22 (#124,404)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Pryor
New York University

Citations of this work

Safety and epistemic luck.Avram Hiller & Ram Neta - 2007 - Synthese 158 (3):303 - 313.
Against global method safety.Sven Bernecker - 2018 - Synthese 197 (12):5101-5116.
Disagreement and the First‐Person Perspective.Gurpreet Rattan - 2014 - Analytic Philosophy 55 (1):31-53.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references