The role of parameters in bar rule and bar induction

Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):715-730 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For several subsystems of second order arithmetic T we show that the proof-theoretic strength of T + (bar rule) can be characterized in terms of T + (bar induction) □ , where the latter scheme arises from the scheme of bar induction by restricting it to well-orderings with no parameters. In addition, we demonstrate that ACA + 0 , ACA 0 + (bar rule) and ACA 0 + (bar induction) □ prove the same Π 1 1 -sentences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#356,447)

6 months
14 (#188,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Rathjen
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Relative truth definability of axiomatic truth theories.Kentaro Fujimoto - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):305-344.
The unfolding of non-finitist arithmetic.Solomon Feferman & Thomas Strahm - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 104 (1-3):75-96.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations