The Need for Basic Rights: A Critique of Nozick's Entitlement Theory

SOCRATES 2 (3):18-26 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the Libertarian Party has gained traction as the third biggest political party in the United States, the philosophical grounding of the party, which is exemplified by Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory is inherently flawed. Libertarianism’s emphasis on a free market leads to gross inequalities since it has no regard for sacred rights other than one’s right to freedom from interference from the government beyond what is essential for societal functioning. I argue that Nozick’s entitlement theory leads to indirect injustice and is therefore an unfitting philosophical theory, which means that the Libertarian Party’s platform is flawed.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why "business's nastier friends" should not be libertarians.Simon A. Hailwood - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (1):77 - 86.
Green Libertarianism.Garvan Walshe - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):955-970.
2004. Nozick's flawless libertarianism?On Nozick - 2005 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 19 (3):103-08.
6 The Entitlement Theory of Justice.Robert Nozick - forthcoming - Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader.
The Squirrel and the State.Nicolas Maloberti - 2010 - The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387.
Robert Nozick, Libertarian?Paul Boaheng & Wesley Cooper - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):257-266.
Nozick and Locke: Filling the space of rights.Jeremy Waldron - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):81-110.
From Nozick to welfare rights: Self‐ownership, property, and moral desert.Adrian Bardon - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (4):481-501.
Libertarianism and Private Property in Land I.Walter Horn - 1984 - American Journal of Economics and Sociology 43 (3):341-356.
Procedural versus substantive justice: Rawls and Nozick.David Lewis Schaefer - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):164-186.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-10

Downloads
16,070 (#164)

6 months
805 (#1,503)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Casey Rentmeester
University of South Florida (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references