Proofs and Models in Philosophical Logic

Cambridge University Press (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Element is an introduction to recent work proofs and models in philosophical logic, with a focus on the semantic paradoxes the sorites paradox. It introduces and motivates different proof systems and different kinds of models for a range of logics, including classical logic, intuitionistic logic, a range of three-valued and four-valued logics, and substructural logics. It also compares and contrasts the different approaches to substructural treatments of the paradox, showing how the structural rules of contraction, cut and identity feature in paradoxical derivations. It then introduces model theoretic treatments of the paradoxes, including a simple fixed-point model construction which generates three-valued models for theories of truth, which can provide models for a range of different non-classical logics. The Element closes with a discussion of the relationship between proofs and models, arguing that both have their place in the philosophers' and logicians' toolkits.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Formal logic: Classical problems and proofs.Luis M. Augusto - 2019 - London, UK: College Publications.
Hypothetical Logic of Proofs.Eduardo Bonelli & Gabriela Steren - 2014 - Logica Universalis 8 (1):103-140.
Models for the logic of possible proofs.Leon Horsten - 2000 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):49–66.
Models for the Logic of Possible Proofs.Leon Horsten - 2000 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):49-66.
Electronic Media Review.Michael B. Burke - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (3):255-260.
Logic of proofs and provability.Tatiana Yavorskaya - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 113 (1-3):345-372.
Problemas para a Explicação Matemática.Eduardo Castro - 2017 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):1437-1462.
The Basic Intuitionistic Logic of Proofs.Sergei Artemov & Rosalie Iemhoff - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (2):439 - 451.
The logic of proofs, semantically.Melvin Fitting - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132 (1):1-25.
An Analytic Calculus for the Intuitionistic Logic of Proofs.Brian Hill & Francesca Poggiolesi - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (3):353-393.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-09

Downloads
2 (#1,808,473)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Logical Disagreement.Frederik J. Andersen - 2024 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references