The Role of Causation in Decision of Tort Law

Journal of Law, Development and Politics 1 (2) (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tort law depends on three key concepts: causation, responsibility, and fault. However, I argue that the three key concepts are neither necessary, nor sufficient, for tort.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Contrastive causation in the law.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Legal Theory 16 (4):259-297.
Causation and uncertainty: Making connections in a time of change.Andrew R. Klein - unknown
Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law.David G. Owen (ed.) - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Disconnection and Responsibility.Jonathan Schaffer - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (4):399-435.
Can tort law be moral?Avihay Dorfman - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):205-228.
Causation and corrective justice: Does tort law make sense? [REVIEW]Larry A. Alexander - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (1):1 - 23.
Causation in AI and law.Jos Lehmann, Joost Breuker & Bob Brouwer - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):279-315.
Legal causation and imputation in English law (causalité juridique et imputation: Réflexions sur quelques développements récents en Droit anglais).Stathis Banakas - unknown
Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics.Michael S. Moore - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-09

Downloads
560 (#32,824)

6 months
75 (#65,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Robinson
University of West Florida

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references