Behavior, purpose and teleology

Philosophy of Science 10 (1):18-24 (1943)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay has two goals. The first is to define the behavioristic study of natural events and to classify behavior. The second is to stress the importance of the concept of purpose.Given any object, relatively abstracted from its surroundings for study, the behavioristic approach consists in the examination of the output of the object and of the relations of this output to the input. By output is meant any change produced in the surroundings by the object. By input, conversely, is meant any event external to the object that modifies this object in any manner.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teleology.Andrew Woodfield - 1976 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Explanation Of Behaviour.C. Taylor - 1964 - Humanities Press.
Explanation, teleology, and operant behaviorism.Jon D. Ringen - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (June):223-253.
Cybernetics and theories of mind.Glenn Negley - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (September):574-82.
The Irony of Chance: On Aristotle’s Physics B, 4-6.Pascal Massie - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):15-28.
Kant on biological teleology: Towards a two-level interpretation.Marcel Quarfood - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):735-747.
Explaining human behavior.Ronald J. Glossop - 1970 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (March):444-449.
Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior.Arturo Rosenblueth & Norbert Wiener - 1950 - Philosophy of Science 17 (4):318-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
145 (#130,585)

6 months
31 (#106,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Studies in the logic of explanation.Carl Gustav Hempel & Paul Oppenheim - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
An organizational account of biological functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
Organisms ≠ Machines.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):669-678.

View all 211 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references