Computational motor planning and the theory of event coding

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):902-903 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent computational models of motor planning have relied heavily on anticipating the consequences of motor acts. Such anticipation is vital for dealing with the redundancy problem of motor control (i.e., the problem of selecting a particular motor solution when more than one is possible to achieve a goal). Computational approaches to motor planning support the Theory of Event Coding (TEC).

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x01450102

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conscious and effortful or effortless and automatic: A practice/performance paradox in motor learning.Flavio T. P. Oliveira & David Goodman - 2004 - Perceptual and Motor Skills 99 (1):315-324.
Event coding as feature guessing: The lessons of the motor theory of speech perception.Bruno Galantucci, Carol A. Fowler & M. T. Turvey - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):886-887.
Perception, action, and motor control: Interaction does not necessarily imply common structures.L. Pisella, A. Kritikos & Y. Rossetti - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):898-899.
Mental simulation and motor imagery.Gregory Currie & Ian Ravenscroft - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (1):161-80.
The planning–control model and spatio-motor deficits following brain damage.H. Branch Coslett & Laurel J. Buxbaum - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):31-32.
Defining visuomotor dissociations and an application to the oculomotor system.Bruce Bridgeman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):27-28.
A gestalt theoretic account for the coordination of perception and action in motor learning.Alf C. Zimmer & Hermann Körndle - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (2):249-265.
Evidence from optic ataxia does not support a distinction between planning and control mechanisms in human motor control.Roger Newport, Sally Pears & Stephen R. Jackson - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):45-46.
How are cognition and movement control related to each other?Maurizio Gentilucci & Sergio Chieffi - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):36-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#555,479)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references