Genetic Exceptionalism vs. Paradigm Shift: Lessons from HIV

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):141-148 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term “exceptionalism” was introduced into health care in 1991 when Bayer described “HIV exceptionalism” as the policy of treating the human immunodeficiency virus different from other infectious diseases, particularly other sexually transmitted diseases. It was reflected in the following practices: pre- and post-HIV test counseling, the development of specific separate consent forms for HIV testing, and stringent requirements for confidentiality of HIV test results. The justification for these practices was the belief that testing was essential for prevention and that patients might not seek HIV testing if confidentiality were not guaranteed. Confidentiality was believed to be particularly important given the degree of discrimination and stigmatization associated with the illness. Anonymous testing was a further step in ensuring strict confidentiality, even though such a practice prevented public officials from contacting partners and others who were at risk.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic Exceptionalism vs. Paradigm Shift: Lessons from HIV.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):141-148.
Genetic information: Important but not “exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
Genetic Exceptionalism and Legislative Pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (s2):59-65.
Feminist Research and Paradigm Shift in Anthropology.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (2):343-362.
Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement.B. M. Kious - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Property rights in genetic information.Richard A. Spinello - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):29-42.
What Lessons Can We Learn from the Exceptionalism Debate (Finally)?Zita Lazzarini - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):149-151.
Genetic exceptionalism & legislative pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (4):27-33.
What Lessons Can We Learn from the Exceptionalism Debate (Finally)?Zita Lazzarini - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):149-151.
Genetic Exceptionalism and Legislative Pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):59-65.
A paradigm shift in Heidegger research.Thomas Sheehan - 2001 - Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):183-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
12 (#1,109,269)

6 months
2 (#1,249,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lainie Ross
University of Rochester

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Should the Baby Live?Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer - 1985 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Silent World of Doctor and Patient.Daniel Callahan & Jay Katz - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (6):47.

View all 11 references / Add more references