Jury Reform and Live Deliberation Research

Amicus Curiae 5 (1):64-70 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Researchers face perennial difficulties in studying live jury deliberation. As a result, the academic community struggles to reach a consensus on key matters of legal reform concerning jury trials. The hurdles faced by empirical jury researchers are often legal or institutional. This note argues that the legal and institutional barriers preventing live deliberation research should be removed and discusses two forms that live deliberation research could take.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Curious Case of the Jury-shaped Hole: A Plea for Real Jury Research.Lewis Ross - forthcoming - International Journal of Evidence and Proof.
Mock Juries, Real Trials: How to Solve (some) Problems with Jury Science.Lewis Ross - forthcoming - Journal of Law and Society.
Waiving Jury Deliberation.Andrei Poama - 2020 - Social Theory and Practice 46 (1):181-204.
Should juries deliberate?Brian R. Hedden - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (4):368-386.
Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds.Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann - manuscript
Jury Theorems.Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann - 2021 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The plea jury.Laura I. Appleman - unknown
Introduction to Psychological Criminology: Jury Verdicts and Jury Research Methodology.Michelle B. Cowley-Cunningham - 2017 - Legal Anthropology eJournal, Archives of Vols. 1-3, 2016-18 Vol. 2, Issues 248: December 20,.
Response to commentaries on ‘Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK’.Elizabeth Ford & Malcolm Oswald - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (6):384-385.
Necessity and Jury Nullification.Travis Hreno - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2):351-378.
Epistemic Democracy with Defensible Premises.Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann - 2013 - Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):87--120.
Wanted: Angela Davis and a Jury of Her Peers.Sonali Chakravarti - 2021 - Political Theory 49 (3):380-402.
Voting, deliberation and truth.Stephan Hartmann & Soroush Rafiee Rad - 2018 - Synthese 195 (3):1-21.
The significance of deliberation for the legitimation of social institutions.Natalia Fialko - 2022 - Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 3:185-197.
The Mnemonic Consequences of Jurors’ Selective Retrieval During Deliberation.Alexander C. V. Jay, Charles B. Stone, Robert Meksin, Clinton Merck, Natalie S. Gordon & William Hirst - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (4):627-643.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-28

Downloads
56 (#287,207)

6 months
56 (#83,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lewis Ross
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references