‘Screen and intervene’: governing risky brains

History of the Human Sciences 23 (1):79-105 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that a new diagram is emerging in the criminal justice system as it encounters developments in the neurosciences. This does not take the form that concerns many ‘neuroethicists’ — it does not entail a challenge to doctrines of free will and the notion of the autonomous legal subject — but is developing around the themes of susceptibility, risk, pre-emption and precaution. I term this diagram ‘screen and intervene’ and in this article I attempt to trace out this new configuration and consider some of the consequences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Being a ‘Screen’ of God?Xiaoqiang Han - 2008 - Res Cogitans, Journal of Philosophy 5 (1).
The Screen as an In-between.Robrecht Vanderbeeken - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2-3):245-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
45 (#361,951)

6 months
8 (#411,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?