Singular terms and arithmetical logicism

Philosophical Books 44 (3):193--219 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a critical notice of Bob Hale and Crispin Wright's *The Reason's Proper Study* (OUP). It focuses particularly on their attempts (crucial to their neo-logicist project) to say what a singular term is. I identify problems for their account but include some constructive suggestions about how it might be improved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-18

Downloads
95 (#182,244)

6 months
11 (#243,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Rumfitt
Oxford University

Citations of this work

III-Reference by Abstraction.ØYstein Linnebo - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):45-71.
Abstractionism and Mathematical Singular Reference.Bahram Assadian - 2019 - Philosophia Mathematica 27 (2):177-198.
A general theory of abstraction operators.Neil Tennant - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references