To Austin or not to Austin, that's the disjunction

Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/b:phil.0000033756.70177.3d

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The limits of self-awareness.Michael G. F. Martin - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):37-89.
Austin on some problems of perception.Jack Pustilnik - 1965 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):18-22.
Austin and the argument from illusion.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (July):372-382.
Austin on perception.W. F. R. Hardie - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (July):253-263.
Austin and perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.
Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory.Michael Durrant & Charles Sayward - 1967 - Analysis 27 (April):167-170.
Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
What is disjunctivism?Michael Thau - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):193-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
149 (#127,423)

6 months
14 (#184,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Schwartz
University of Abertay Dundee

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vision: Variations On Some Berkeleian Themes.Robert Schwartz - 1995 - Behavior and Philosophy 23 (1):53-57.
Avoiding errors about error. Schwartz - 2003 - In Rainer Mausfeld & Dieter Heyer (eds.), Colour Perception: Mind and the Physical World. Oxford University Press.

Add more references