Electrophysiological Evidence Reveals Differences between the Recognition of Microexpressions and Macroexpressions

, , &
Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01346

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary: Electrophysiological Evidence Reveals Differences between the Recognition of Microexpressions and Macroexpressions.David Matsumoto & Hyisung C. Hwang - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition.Edwin J. Burns, Jeremy J. Tree & Christoph T. Weidemann - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
The Establishment of Weak Ecological Microexpressions Recognition Test : An Extension on EMERT.Ming Yin, Liangchen Tian, Wei Hua, Jianxin Zhang & Dianzhi Liu - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Electrophysiological evidence for the effects of emotional content on false recognition memory.Zhiwei Zheng, Minjia Lang, Wei Wang, Fengqiu Xiao & Juan Li - 2018 - Cognition 179 (C):298-310.
Brain preparation before a voluntary action: Evidence against unconscious movement initiation.Judy Trevena & Jeff Miller - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):447-456.
Taking apart the neural machinery of face processing.Winrich Freiwald & Doris Tsao - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
Electrophysiological Evidence of a Delay in the Visual Recognition Process in Young Children.Catarina I. Barriga-Paulino, Elena I. Rodríguez-Martínez, Mª Ángeles Rojas-Benjumea & Carlos M. Gómez González - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
People of Lower Social Status Are More Sensitive to Hedonic Product Information—Electrophysiological Evidence From an ERP Study.Weiguo di ChenQu, Yanhui Xiang, Jiaxu Zhao & Guyu Shen - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13.
Recognition memory of neutral words can be impaired by task-irrelevant emotional encoding contexts: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Qin Zhang, Xuan Liu, Wei An, Yang Yang & Yinan Wang - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
Self-recognition.James R. Anderson, Gordon G. Gallup & Steven M. Platek - 2011 - In Shaun Gallagher (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self. Oxford University Press.
“See Me, Feel Me”: Two Modes of Affect Recognition for Real and Fictional Targets.Christiana Werner - 2020 - Topoi 39 (4):827-834.
Can we really leave gender out of it? Individual differences and the Simulation of Smiles model.Elizabeth Simpson & Dorothy Fragaszy - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):459-460.
Microexpressions Are Not the Best Way to Catch a Liar.Judee K. Burgoon - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
On Recognition.Kristina Sabikova - 2009 - Filozofia 64 (4):356-361.
Differences, games, and pluralism.Roger A. McCain - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):688-689.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-14

Downloads
8 (#1,324,759)

6 months
2 (#1,206,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lie Catching and Micro Expressions.Paul Ekman - 2009 - In Clancy W. Martin (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford University Press. pp. 118--133.
The face-sensitive N170 component of the event-related brain potential.Martin Eimer - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 329--344.

Add more references