Misperception

Abstract

In discussions of perception and its provision of knowledge, it is common to distinguish what one comes to believe on the basis of perception from the distinctively perceptual basis of one's belief. The distinction can be drawn in terms of propositional contents: there are the contents that a perceiver would normally come to believe on the basis of her perception, on the one hand; and there are the contents properly attributed to perception itself, on the other. Consider the content

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,437

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Which Properties Are Represented in Perception.Susanna Siegel - 2005 - In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-503.
The Admissible Contents of Experience.Fiona Macpherson (ed.) - 2011 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sense Experiences and Their Contents: A Defense of the Propositional Account.Michael Pendlebury - 1990 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):215-30.
The contents of perception.Susanna Siegel - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Clades, Capgras, and Perceptual Kinds.Jack Lyons - 2005 - Philosophical Topics 33 (1):185-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
158 (#119,213)

6 months
1 (#1,483,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susanna Siegel
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references