The Rationality of Perception : Replies to Lord, Railton, and Pautz

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (3):764-771 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My replies to Errol Lord, Adam Pautz, and Peter Railton's commentaries on The Rationality of Perception (2017).

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/phpr.12737

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Replies to Nagel, Pautz, and Railton_2018 Eastern APA.Susanna Siegel - manuscript
The Rationality of Perception: Reply to Begby, Ghijsen, and Samoilova.Susanna Siegel - 2018 - Analysis (Reviews).
Perception as Guessing Versus Perception as Knowing: Replies to Clark and Peacocke.Susanna Siegel - 2018 - Res Philosophica 95 (4):761-784.
How to Explain the Rationality of Perception.Harmen Ghijsen - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):500-512.
Justification Upgrading and the Knowledge Baseline.Kateryna Samoilova - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):512-523.
Phenomenal evidence and factive evidence defended: replies to McGrath, Pautz, and Neta.Susanna Schellenberg - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):929-946.
Replies to Beck, Chirimuuta, Rosenhagen, Smithies, and Springle.Susanna Siegel - 2018 - Analytic Philosophy 59 (1):175-190.
What is my evidence that here is a cup? Comments on Susanna Schellenberg.Adam Pautz - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):915-927.
Replies to Brewer, Gupta, and McDowell.Susanna Siegel - 2019 - Philosophical Issues 29 (1):403-410.
Replies to Wang, Speaks, and Pautz.Trenton Merricks - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):487-505.
The Epistemology of Perception.Susanna Siegel & Nicholas Silins - 2015 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press.
Replies to Commentators.Annalisa Coliva - 2017 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7 (4):281-295.
Review of Susanna Siegel-The Rationality of Perception. [REVIEW]Dustin Stokes - 2018 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 6:1-2.
Perception.Adam Pautz - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Does the ‘Missing Fundamental’ Require an Inferentialist Explanation?J. A. Judge - 2017 - Topoi 36 (2):319-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-31

Downloads
877 (#16,678)

6 months
129 (#29,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susanna Siegel
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Perceptual Pluralism.Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2019 - Noûs 54 (4):807-838.
Knowledge of things.Matt Duncan - 2020 - Synthese 197 (8):3559-3592.
The Epistemic Role of Core Cognition.Zoe Jenkin - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (2):251-298.
Delimiting the Boundaries of Inference.Paul Boghossian - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):55-69.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Epistemic and the Zetetic.Jane Friedman - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):501-536.
What is inference?Paul Boghossian - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):1-18.
The Conflict of Evidence and Coherence.Alex Worsnip - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1):3-44.
The obscure object of hallucination.Mark Johnston - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):113-83.

View all 17 references / Add more references