Paradox and tragedy in human morality

International Political Science Review 15 (347):378 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An evolutionary approach to ethics supports, to some extent, the sceptical meta-ethics found by some of the Greek sophists and Nietzsche. On the other hand, a modern naturalistic account on the origin and nature of morality, leads to somewhat different conclusions. This is demonstrated with an answer to three philosophical questions: does real freedom exist?, does the good, or real virtue, exist?, does life have a meaning?

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-11

Downloads
1,121 (#11,586)

6 months
90 (#53,660)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pouwel Slurink
University of Nijmegen (PhD)

Citations of this work

Evolutionaire ethiek: kan dat?Pouwel Slurink - 2000 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte (1):63-84.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
On Human Nature.Edward O. Wilson - 1978 - Harvard University Press.
Freedom and reason.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1963 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references