"Striving, Happiness, and the Good: Spinoza as Follower and Critic of Hobbes"

In A Blackwell Companion to Hobbes. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 431 – 447 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is often noted that Spinoza’s conception of striving (conatus) reflects the influence of Hobbes. While this is undoubtedly true, in this chapter I explore how an important difference in how Hobbes and Spinoza understand “striving” drives a wedge between them, resulting in remarkably different views of goodness, happiness, liberty, and the function of the state.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theory of Conatus.Valtteri Viljanen - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos (ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Imprint Academic. pp. 95–105.
Spinoza's unorthodox metaphysics of the will.Karolina Hübner - 2013 - In Michael Della Rocca (ed.), The Oxford Handbook to Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Relation of Conatus with spinoza`s Ethics.Muhammad Ali Abdllahi & Muhammad Gharibzade - 2017 - Metaphysics (University of Isfahan) 9 (23):69-82.
Spinoza's Rejection of Teleology.Edward Andrew Greetis - 2010 - Revista Conatus - Filosofia de Spinoza 4 (8):25-35.
Droit, pouvoir et liberté: Spinoza critique de Hobbes.Christian Lazzeri - 1998 - Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
Hobbes or Spinoza? Two Epicurean Versions of the Social Contract.Dimitris Vardoulakis - 2020 - InCircolo - Rivista di Filosofia E Culture 9:186-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-23

Downloads
207 (#97,782)

6 months
88 (#54,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin Steinberg
Brooklyn College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references