The Metainductive Justification of Induction: The Pool of Strategies

Philosophy of Science 86 (5):981-992 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article poses a challenge to Schurz’s proposed metainductive justification of induction. It is argued that Schurz’s argument requires a notion of optimality that can deal with an expanding pool of prediction strategies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Not To Know The Principle of Induction.Howard Sankey - 2021 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11 (3):243-254.
The uniformity of nature.Wesley C. Salmon - 1953 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1):39-48.
Justification of Induction: Russell and Jin Yuelin. A Comparative Study.Chen Bo - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):353-378.
Induction and justification.Frederick L. Will - 1974 - Ithaca [N.Y.]: Cornell University Press.
The pragmatic justification of induction.Wesley Salmon - 1974 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), The justification of induction. New York]: Oxford University Press. pp. 85--97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-07

Downloads
53 (#302,735)

6 months
34 (#102,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom F. Sterkenburg
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Précis of Inference to the Best Explanation, 2 nd Edition.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.

View all 9 references / Add more references