The Constitution of Objects by Systems

Abstract

Against the concept that objects are defined by their self-contained essence – “thing-in-themselves” – Husserl and Foucault claim they are defined by intersubjectivity or social institutions. I argue that biological and even physical (complex) systems can constitute the unity and meaning of objects.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Must Complex Systems Theory Be Materialistic?Horace Fairlamb - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):1-3.
Extending and expanding the Darwinian synthesis: the role of complex systems dynamics.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):75-81.
Arbitrariness in nature: synergetics and evolutionary laws of prohibition.Hermann Haken & Helena Knyazeva - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):57-73.
For a Topology of Dynamical Systems.Claudio Mazzola & Marco Giunti - 2016 - In Gianfranco Minati, Mario Abram & Eliano Pessa (eds.), Towards a post-Bertalanffy systemics. Springers. pp. 81-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-12

Downloads
224 (#91,518)

6 months
78 (#63,736)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David L. Thompson
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references