Aristotle, potential and actual, conflicts

Abstract

In The Metaphysics Book Theta, Chapter four, Aristotle claims that to state that “some X is possible but X will never be” is a mistake. In effect, he collapses the possible into the actual. This view conflicts with the existence of dispositions which I argue exist, as they are indispensable to science. In Theta Chapter three, Aristotle sets out a test of possibility whereby we assume that some entity exists and then see if an impossibility ensues. I apply this test to Aristotle’s theory and show that it entails the impossibility of dispositions. Given the clear existence of dispositions, Aristotle’s conflation of the possible with the actual fails his own test of possibility and must be wrong.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Actual versus Potential Infinity (BPhil manuscript.).Anne Newstead - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
Aristotelian finitism.Tamer Nawar - 2015 - Synthese 192 (8):2345-2360.
Aristotle's Megarian Manoeuvres.Kit Fine - 2011 - Mind 120 (480):993-1034.
Aristotle on mathematical infinity.Theokritos Kouremenos - 1995 - Stuttgart: F. Steiner. Edited by Aristotle.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
Foundations of Aristotle's Philosophy of Action.Daniel Watkins Graham - 1980 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-20

Downloads
18 (#836,872)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew John Turner
University of Adelaide (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references