Slingshot arguments: two versions

The Reasoner 3 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first installment of a paper comparing the standard slingshot argument with the doxastic version.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Slingshot Argument, Gödel's Hesitation and Tarskian Semantics.Arhat Virdi - 2009 - Prolegomena 8 (1):233-241.
Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument.Michael Baumgartner - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):531-556.
Bogus singular terms and substitution salva denotatione.Rafal Urbaniak - 2009 - The Reasoner 3.
How Wittgenstein Escapes the Slingshot.A. C. Genova - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:1-22.
Truthmaking and the Slingshot.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 1999 - In Uwe Meixner & Peter Simons (eds.), Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age: Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
One way to face facts.Greg Restall - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):420–426.
Evading the Slingshot.John Perry - 1996 - In J. Ezquerro A. Clark (ed.), Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Categories, Consciousness, and Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stephen Neale, Facing Facts, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, xv + 254 pp. [REVIEW]Jaroslav Peregrin - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-17

Downloads
111 (#160,505)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rafal Urbaniak
University of Gdansk

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references