Geometry of Relevant Implication II

Australasian Journal of Logic 20 (1):88-94 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note extends earlier results on geometrical interpretations of the logic KR to prove some additional results, including a simple undecidability proof for the four-variable fragment of KR.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relevant Implication and Ordered Geometry.Alasdair Urquhart - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (8):342-354.
Relevant implication and projective geometry.Alasdair Urquhart - 1983 - Logique Et Analyse 26 (3):345-357.
A plea for KR.Alison Duncan Kerr - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3047-3071.
The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication.Alasdair Urquhart - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1059-1073.
Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183.
From practical to pure geometry and back.Mario Bacelar Valente - 2020 - Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática 20 (39):13-33.
Defining relevant implication in a propositionally quantified S.Philip Kremer - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
Defining Relevant Implication in a Propositionally Quantified S4.Philip Kremer - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
Failure of interpolation in relevant logics.Alasdair Urquhart - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):449 - 479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-13

Downloads
10 (#1,198,690)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alasdair Urquhart
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references