Tool-using puffins prickle the puzzle of cognitive evolution

Pnas Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (6):2737-2739 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In PNAS, Fayet et al. report on two cases of tool use in a seabird. In two distant populations they recorded Arctic puffins using sticks to scratch themselves. The documentation of tool use in this species expands the ever-growing list of tool-using birds through rare observations under natural conditions. Although it is neither the first observation of tool use in wild seabirds, nor the first of stick-tool use outside of a foraging context in wild birds, these findings contribute to the debate on the evolutionary and cognitive origins of tool use. Fig. 1. A puffin holding a stick in its beak before using it as a tool to scratch itself. Image courtesy of M. T. Ridoff. Discoveries of tool use in animals attract considerable attention, because tool use remains rare in nature and people intuitively associate it with intelligence. Not long ago, the wielding of tools was considered a purely human affair. In the 1950s, when Jane Goodall observed wild chimpanzees fishing for termites, we realized that tool use does not exclusively define us. Since then, tool use has been observed in an increasing number of species, spanning from invertebrates to apes, but is still only found in fewer than 1% of known genera so far. From this perspective, every discovery of a tool-using species adds an important puzzle piece to understanding this fascinating, rare, and multifarious phenomenon. In the traditional view, tool use reveals intelligence. Therefore, animal tool use has been regarded as one of few windows for studying the evolution of intelligence and our own evolutionary past. However, the picture today is more complex, and while tool use oftentimes does relate to advanced cognition, it is not always the case. The debate typically centers on what cognitive abilities … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: avbayern{at}orn.mpg.de. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The cognitive bases of human tool use.Krist Vaesen - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):203-262.
Language as a cognitive tool.Marco Mirolli & Domenico Parisi - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (4):517-528.
Look, no hands!Eric M. Patterson & Janet Mann - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):235-236.
The Puzzle of False Judgement in the Theaetetus.Nathanael Stein - 2016 - Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 61 (3):260–283.
The explanatory limits of cognitive archaeology.Ben Jeffares - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):410-412.
Meta-tool.Ivo Jacobs & Mathias Osvath - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
Proto-tool.Ivo Jacobs & Mathias Osvath - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
Social Tool.Ivo Jacobs & Mathias Osvath - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
Innate and Learned Tool Use.Ivo Jacobs & Mathias Osvath - 2016 - Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
Afterword: Tough Questions; Hard Problems; Incremental Progress.Kim Sterelny - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (2):766-783.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-06

Downloads
11 (#1,142,960)

6 months
2 (#1,206,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mathias Osvath
Lund University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references