Author's Response: Not Haiography but Ideational Biography: In Defense of Existential Enaction

Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):52-58 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First, we argue that our contribution was not meant as a mythization of Varela’s work, but rather as a Varelian-inspired existential reconstrual of enaction. Second, we expand and elaborate on the notion of dialectics and the role of Buddhist philosophy. Third, we briefly formulate three main domains of investigation for enacting enaction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enacting Enaction: Conceptual Nest or Existential Mutation?S. Vörös - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):148-150.
Enaction Without Hagiography. [REVIEW]Evan Thompson - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (1):41-44.
Enaction, and Its Relation to Science in an Objective Key.F. Cummins - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):245-246.
The Personal Dimension to Ontology.M. Guy Thompson - 2015 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 22 (2):125-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-10

Downloads
23 (#687,700)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references