Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals

Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (3):855-868 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The number of articles published in open access journals has increased dramatically in recent years. Simultaneously, the quality of publications in these journals has been called into question. Few studies have explored the retraction rate from OAJs. The purpose of the current study was to determine the reasons for retractions of articles from OAJs in biomedical research. The Medline database was searched through PubMed to identify retracted publications in OAJs. The journals were identified by the Directory of Open Access Journals. Data were extracted from each retracted article, including the time from publication to retraction, causes, journal impact factor, and country of origin. Trends in the characteristics related to retraction were determined. Data from 621 retracted studies were included in the analysis. The number and rate of retractions have increased since 2010. The most common reasons for retraction are errors, plagiarism, duplicate publication, fraud/suspected fraud and invalid peer review. The number of retracted articles from OAJs has been steadily increasing. Misconduct was the primary reason for retraction. The majority of retracted articles were from journals with low impact factors and authored by researchers from China, India, Iran, and the USA.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks.Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.
Responsible conduct in research.P. J. D. Drenth - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.
The concise argument.S. Holm - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):65-65.
Retracting Inconclusive Research: Lessons from the Séralini GM Maize Feeding Study.David B. Resnik - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):621-633.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-08

Downloads
44 (#363,054)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Wei Chen
Huazhong University of Science & Technology