Double effect reasoning: why we need it

Ethics and Medicine 33 (1):13-19 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “principle of double effect” is a vital tool for moral decision making and is applicable to all areas of medical practice, including (for example) end-of-life care, transplant medicine, and cases of conscientious objection. Both our ultimate and our more immediate intentions are relevant in making and evaluating choices— though side effects must be kept proportionate and can be morally conclusive when linked with some intentions. Intentions help to form the character of doctors, and of human beings generally. While hypocrisy is certainly possible in regard to this form (and other forms) of moral reasoning, double effect reasoning, sincerely practised, remains indispensable in identifying moral problems and solutions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Intention and responsibility in double effect cases.David K. Chan - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):405-434.
The principle of double effect as a guide for medical decision-making.Georg Spielthenner - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):465-473.
The Danger of Double Effect.Philip A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
A Critique of Scanlon on Double Effect.Joshua Stuchlik - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):178-199.
Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good & Avoiding Evil.T. A. Cavanaugh - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
Double Effect and Ethical End-of-Life Care: Assessing the Benefits and Burdens of Lethal Treatment (or Lack Thereof).Giebel Heidi - 2016 - Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 6 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-30

Downloads
302 (#67,870)

6 months
75 (#65,195)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Watt
University of Edinburgh (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references