Informal Logic and the Foundations of Argument

The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:19-24 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informal logic offers a radical new perspective on the evaluation of arguments. But little work has been done on how deep concepts in the logical foundations of argument need to be modified in light of such efforts. This paper offers an indication of what might be done by sketching a new approach to the theory of entailment, truth and relevance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.
Formal Logic for Informal Logicians.David Sherry - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):199-220.
Informal Logic.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Towards a theory of mathematical argument.Ian J. Dove - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):136-152.
The Hiddenness Argument Revisited.J. L. Schellenberg - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Husserl's arguments against logical psychologism.Robert Hanna - 2008 - In Verena E. Mayer & Christopher Erhard (eds.), Edmund Husserl: logische Untersuchungen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag Berlin. pp. 27-42.
A Decision Procedure for Evaluating Natural Language Arguments.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy 12 (1):11-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
49 (#326,442)

6 months
9 (#317,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references