CHAPTER 15. Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?

In Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press. pp. 215-228 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locke on primary and secondary qualities.Samuel C. Rickless - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):297-319.
Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Distinction.Steven Nadler - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):47-61.
Primary and secondary qualities.Peter Ross - 2016 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 405-421.
Primary and Secondary Qualities: Common Sense, Science, and Berkeley.Karann Beth Durland - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Primary and secondary qualities: A return to fundamentals.David Novitz - 1975 - Philosophical Papers 4 (October):89-104.
Mechanism, resemblance and secondary qualities: From Descartes to Locke.Keith Allen - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):273 – 291.
Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction.Elżbieta Łukasiewicz - 2011 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):47-76.
Primary and Secondary Qualities.Robert A. Wilson - 2016 - In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A Companion to Locke. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Blackwell. pp. 193-211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
52 (#307,868)

6 months
5 (#647,370)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references