Moore’s Paradox for God

Philosophia 47 (1):265-270 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that ‘Moore’s paradox for God’. I do not believe this proposition shows that nobody can be both omniscient and rational in all her beliefs. I then anticipate and rebut three objections to my argument.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11406-017-9943-8

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Moore’s Paradoxes and Conscious Belief.John Nicholas Williams - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (3):383-414.
Moore's paradox, Evans's principle, and iterated beliefs.John N. Williams - 2007 - In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
Self‐Knowledge, Rationality and Moore's Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
Moore’s Paradox is not just another pragmatic paradox.Timothy Chan - 2010 - Synthese 173 (3):211 - 229.
Moore's paradox and the structure of conscious belief.Uriah Kriegel - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (1):99-121.
If You Believe You Believe, You Believe. A Constitutive Account of Knowledge of One’s Own Beliefs.Peter Baumann - 2017 - Logos and Episteme:389-416.
Moores Paradox, Behaupten, Urteilen.Christoph C. Pfisterer - 2008 - Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 37 (91):41-62.
Moore's Paradox - One or Two?John N. Williams - 1979 - Analysis 39 (3):141-142.
Moore’s paradox in belief and desire.John N. Williams - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (1):1-23.
Eliminativism, Dialetheism and Moore's Paradox.John N. Williams - 2013 - Theoria 81 (1):27-47.
Consciousness, reasons, and Moore's paradox.André Gallois - 2007 - In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
Moore’s Paradox And Self-Ascribed Belief.Byeong D. Lee - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (3):359-370.
4. Epilogue: The Legacy of Moore’s Paradox.Ulla Schmid - 2014 - In Moore's Paradox: A Critique of Representationalism. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 263-270.
Shoemaker, self-blindness and Moore's paradox.Amy Kind - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):39-48.
What Moore's Paradox Is About.Claudio de Almeida - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):33-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-24

Downloads
38 (#428,039)

6 months
9 (#343,268)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John N. Williams
Singapore Management University

Citations of this work

Moore′s paradox generalized.Claudio de Almeida - 2022 - Theoria 88 (6):1111-1127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Rediscovery of the Mind.John Searle - 1992 - MIT Press. Edited by Ned Block & Hilary Putnam.
The Rediscovery of the Mind.John Searle - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):201-207.
A reply to my critics.George Edward Moore - 1942 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The philosophy of G. E. Moore. New York,: Tudor Pub. Co..
Blindspots.Roy Sorensen - 1990 - Mind 99 (393):137-140.

View all 23 references / Add more references