Hume vs. Reid on ideas: The new Hume letter

Mind 96 (383):392-398 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the newly discovered letter Hume answers Reid's charge that he held a theory of ideas derived from his predecessors and criticizes Reid's own theory of innate ideas. He defends his own theory that ideas are derived from impressions. I discuss Reid's own puzzlement that in the first _Enquiry_ Hume ascribes a natural belief in necessary connections to the vulgar without an idea--and its influence on subsequent readings of Hume as a 'regularity theorist.' I argue that it was the 'Common Sense' school of philosophers following Reid, rather than Hume, who insisted that beliefs must be based on legitimate ideas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Well temper'd eloquence.David Hume - 1996 - Edinburgh: The David Hume Institute. Edited by David Hume & Ingrid A. Merikoski.
Hume’s Progressive View of Human Nature.Michael Gill - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (1):87-108.
Hume on morality.James Baillie - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
Hume on Meaning.Walter Ott - 2006 - Hume Studies 32 (2):233-252.
Justice And Resentment In Hume, Reid, And Smith.Michael S. Pritchard - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):59-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
204 (#100,174)

6 months
12 (#237,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Wright
Central Michigan University

Citations of this work

Triggers of Thought: Impressions within Hume’s Theory of Mind.Anik Waldow - 2010 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 13 (1):105-121.
Whose failure, Reid's or Hume's?James W. F. Somerville - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):247 – 259.
Why Hume's counterexample is insignificant and why it is not.Nancy Kendrick - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):955 – 979.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references