Deviance as Inauthenticity: an Ontological Perspective

Philosophy of Management 15 (2):151-159 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While organizational deviance has become a popular research topic in the past two decades, deviant behavior remains a contested concept, with several research studies being done to better define the term. As a result, researchers have introduced various definitions and constructs which seem to overlap one another. Such proliferation might backfire and could lead to more confusion. Looking at deviance from an ontological aspect, therefore, will help to decrease such confusion among researchers. Another advantage to ontologically viewing deviance is that it provides a better understanding of the concept. To prevent deviance occurring within an organization, the first step is learning more about it. This study therefore aims to discover how researchers can use ontological view to provide a better understanding of deviance, thus creating a deviance-free climate within an organization. This study looks at the role of storytelling in sharing norms within an organization to provide such a deviance-free climate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Institutions and deviance: Art and psychiatry.Laurie Calhoun - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (3):393-409.
Deviance and causalism.Lilian O'brien - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):175-196.
The Mania of Existence: Klein, Winnicott, and Heidegger's Concept of Inauthenticity.Beau Shaw - 2015 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 46 (1):48-60.
Two kinds of deviance.William H. Hanson - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):15-28.
Basic deviance reconsidered.Markus E. Schlosser - 2007 - Analysis 67 (3):186–194.
Nondeviant Chains in Intentional Action.Robert K. Shope - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:15-49.
A study in modal deviance.Gideon Rosen - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 283--307.
What's Bad About Bad Faith?Allan Hazlett Simon D. Feldman - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):50-73.
Another sociological perspective on deviance in science.Jerry Gaston - 1983 - In Brock K. Kilbourne & Maria T. Kilbourne (eds.), The Dark Side of Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division. pp. 54--64.
What's Bad About Bad Faith?Simon D. Feldman & Allan Hazlett - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):50-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
16 (#913,262)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Ethics of Authenticity.Charles Taylor - 1991 - Harvard University Press.
Collective Intentions and Actions.John Searle - 1990 - In Philip R. Cohen Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication. MIT Press. pp. 401-415.
Shared cooperative activity.Michael E. Bratman - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):327-341.

View all 12 references / Add more references