O problemach w definiowaniu pojęcia prawa przyrody

Filozofia Nauki 20 (2) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article is a critical commentary on explication of the notion of law of nature based on the concept of counterfactual proposition. The view in question was originally proposed in the 40’s of past century by Roderick M. Chisholm and Nelson Goodman (further referred to as ‘CG criterion’) and has been popular among philosophers ever since

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Własności i prawa przyrody w esencjalizmie dyspozycyjnym.Rafał Wodzisz - 2011 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica 24:121-136.
Podstawowe pojęcia teorii prawa, poznań 1924.Czesław Znamierowski - 1925 - Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 3 (2):238-240.
O definiowaniu rodzin znaczeniowych.L. Koj - 1969 - Studia Logica 25 (1):150-150.
O znajdowaniu i definiowaniu gromad galaktyk.Piotr Flin - 2000 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adrian Ziółkowski
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references