Indestructibility of some compactness principles over models of PFA

, &
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 175 (1):103359 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.apal.2023.103359

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aspects of strong compactness, measurability, and indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (8):705-719.
Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840.
Supercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):155-163.
An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322.
On the indestructibility aspects of identity crisis.Grigor Sargsyan - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):493-513.
Indestructibility under adding Cohen subsets and level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (3):271-279.
Indestructibility when the first two measurable cardinals are strongly compact.Arthur W. Apter - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (1):214-227.
Universal indestructibility for degrees of supercompactness and strongly compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (2):133-142.
Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins? lottery preparation.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (8):717-735.
The least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructible.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (1-3):33-42.
Indestructibility, measurability, and degrees of supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1):75-82.
Indestructibility and level by level equivalence and inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (1):78-85.
A universal indestructibility theorem compatible with level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (3-4):463-470.
Universal partial indestructibility and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):524-531.
Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals II: Applications to level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):457-463.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-31

Downloads
13 (#1,042,023)

6 months
6 (#530,399)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
Aronszajn trees on ℵ2 and ℵ3.Uri Abraham - 1983 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 24 (3):213-230.
Perfect-set forcing for uncountable cardinals.Akihiro Kanamori - 1980 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 19 (1-2):97-114.
The combinatorial essence of supercompactness.Christoph Weiß - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1710-1717.

View all 21 references / Add more references