Thoughts, oughts and the conceptual primacy of belief

Analysis 68 (3):234-238 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No Abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/68.3.234

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Unbelievable thoughts and doxastic oughts.Adam C. Podlaskowski - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):112-118.
Three challenges (and three replies) to the ethics of belief.Brian Huss - 2009 - Synthese 168 (2):249-271.
Oughts and thoughts: rule-following and the normativity of content.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Truth promoting non-evidential reasons for belief.Brian Talbot - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):599-618.
Thoughts and oughts.Seyed Ali Kalantari - unknown
Prima Facie and Pro Tanto Oughts.Andrew Reisner - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
Epistemic constraints on practical normativity.Simon Robertson - 2011 - Synthese 181 (S1):81-106.
Objective Oughts and a Puzzle about Futurity.Marra Alessandra - 2016 - In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. London, UK: College Publications. pp. 171-186.
Thoughts on Oughts.Stephen Anderson - 2013 - Philosophy Now 99:26-29.
Conceptual evidentialism.Inga Nayding - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):39-65.
Oughts and Thoughts: Rule‐Following and the Normativity of Content, by Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Tim Kraft - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):336-341.
Imperatives, oughts, and moral oughts.Hector-Neri Castaneda - 1966 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):277 – 300.
Authorship and Control over Thoughts.Gottfried Vosgerau & Martin Voss - 2014 - Mind and Language 29 (5):534-565.
Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content, by Anandi Hattiangadi.: Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Hannah Ginsborg - 2010 - Mind 119 (476):1175-1186.
Oughts and thoughts: Rule-following and the normativity of content – Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Daniel Whiting - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):743-745.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#172,107)

6 months
14 (#184,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander B. Miller
The Catholic University of America

Citations of this work

Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist.Javier González de Prado & Víctor M. Verdejo - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (10):1051-1072.
Disbelieving the Normativity of Content.Víctor M. Verdejo - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (4):441-456.
A verisimilitudinarian analysis of the Linda paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic operators.Fred I. Dretske - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (24):1007-1023.
Epistemic Operators.Fred Dretske - 1999 - In Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Skepticism: a contemporary reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
The normativity of content.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
Does thought imply ought?Krister Bykvist & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):277–285.
Transmission Failure Failure.Nicholas Silins - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):71-102.

View all 12 references / Add more references