Logical Conceptualization of Knowledge on the Notion of Language Communication

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 52 (1):247-269 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main objective of the paper is to provide a conceptual apparatus of a general logical theory of language communication. The aim of the paper is to outline a formal-logical theory of language in which the concepts of the phenomenon of language communication and language communication in general are defined and some conditions for their adequacy are formulated. The theory explicates the key notions of contemporary syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. The theory is formalized on two levels: token-level and type-level. As such, it takes into account the dual – token and type – ontological character of linguistic entities. The basic notions of the theory: language communication, meaning and interpretation are introduced on the second, type-level of formalization, and their required prior formalization of some of the notions introduced on the first, token-level; among others, the notion of an act of communication. Owing to the theory, it is possible to address the problems of adequacy of both empirical acts of communication and of language communication in general. All the conditions of adequacy of communication discussed in the presented paper, are valid for one-way communication (sender-recipient); nevertheless, they can also apply to the reverse direction of language communication (recipient-sender). Therefore, they concern the problem of two-way understanding in language communication.

Similar books and articles

On Language Adequacy.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1):257-292.
Obstacles To Communication, Enhancement Of Communication, Criteria For Successful Communication.Mladen Jovanovic - 1999 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 2 (6):41-54.
Meaning and Interpretation. I.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (1):105-132.
Cosmopolitan Communication and the Broken Dream of a Common Language.Niclas Rönnström - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):260-282.
In defense of public language.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2003 - In Louise M. Antony & H. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 215–237.
The adequacy of language.David Harrah - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):73 – 88.
Incommensurability and Cross-Language Communication.Xinli Wang - 2007 - Ashgate Publishing Ltd, England.
Communication and folk psychology.Richard Breheny - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (1):74-107.
From code to speaker meaning.Kim Sterelny - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):819-838.
La ética del lenguaje: Habermas y Levinas.Pedro Rojas - 2000 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 23 (1):35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-25

Downloads
554 (#33,126)

6 months
99 (#46,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Universal grammar.Richard Montague - 1970 - Theoria 36 (3):373--398.
English as a Formal Language.Richard Montague - 1970 - In Bruno Visentini (ed.), Linguaggi nella societa e nella tecnica. Edizioni di Communita. pp. 188-221.
The Mathematics of Sentence Structure.Joachim Lambek - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):154-170.
Pragmatics and intensional logic.Richard Montague - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):68--94.
Language and Information.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (3):382-385.

View all 17 references / Add more references