The aim of this review is to comment on two main issues: (i) the critiques that McBride addresses to competing accounts of private law (I claim that they miss the mark) and (ii) the account of human flourishing that McBride sees as underlying English private law, which he calls the ‘RP’ (‘RP’ stands both for ‘reflective picture’ and ‘received picture’ of human flourishing). I raise some worries about the nature and content of the RP as explained by McBride.

Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2019, Page 597-606.