Imagination can be seen 1) as a mental faculty common to all people to some degree and 2) as an important principle in literary theory. We must think of imagination not as a simple power but a complex series of processes, involving the impression-idea-relationship and memory. The data derived thus are still bound to their epistemological context, and only imagination provides the possibility to transcend the space-time-determination and the cause-effect-relationship, so that it allows a freer display of the sense-data. This (...) structural and functional analysis of imagination tries to show its immense importance in everyday-life as well as in literary production and reception. (shrink)

What I am going to ask myself in this paper consists of two questions, which are interrelated: How should the discipline "Anglistik" be reconstructed from a theoretical point of view under consideration of intellectual and social history? In which way can this reconstruction have an effect on teaching English literature in universities? In answering the first question let me begin with a short outline concerning the ideological history of "Anglistik" from the 19th century to the present day. This short and (...) rough outline shall help to explain, why there is the obvious deficiency in theory, which nobody can deny who knows German Anglistik from within . Then I proceed in listing the necessary elements of a rational Anglistik, which have to be integrated into the discipline of the future. This description deals with the theoretical and teleological aspects of the reconstruction . In the last section I try to warrant my proposition to reconstruct Anglistik by an example, which has the task to demonstrate the interrelation of literary history, intellectual and social history within the discipline. (shrink)

What I am going to ask myself in this paper consists of two questions, which are interrelated: (1) How should the discipline “Anglistik” be reconstructed from a theoretical point of view under consideration of intellectual and social history? (2) In which way can this reconstruction have an effect on teaching English literature in universities? In answering the first question let me begin with a short outline concerning the ideological history of “Anglistik” from the 19th century to the present day. This (...) short and rough outline shall help to explain, why there is the obvious deficiency in theory, which nobody can deny who knows German Anglistik from within (I). Then I proceed in listing the necessary elements of a rational Anglistik, which have to be integrated into the discipline of the future. This description deals with the theoretical and teleological aspects of the reconstruction (II). In the last section I try to warrant my proposition to reconstruct Anglistik by an example, which has the task to demonstrate the interrelation of literary history, intellectual and social history within the discipline (III). (shrink)