6 found
Order:
  1.  12
    The proof complexity of linear algebra.Michael Soltys & Stephen Cook - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 130 (1-3):277-323.
    We introduce three formal theories of increasing strength for linear algebra in order to study the complexity of the concepts needed to prove the basic theorems of the subject. We give what is apparently the first feasible proofs of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem and other properties of the determinant, and study the propositional proof complexity of matrix identities such as AB=I→BA=I.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2. Boolean programs and quantified propositional proof systems.Stephen Cook & Michael Soltys - 1999 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 28 (3):119-129.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  7
    An introduction to the analysis of algorithms.Michael Soltys - 2012 - New Jersey: World Scientific.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  23
    Matrix identities and the pigeonhole principle.Michael Soltys & Alasdair Urquhart - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (3):351-357.
    We show that short bounded-depth Frege proofs of matrix identities, such as PQ=I⊃QP=I (over the field of two elements), imply short bounded-depth Frege proofs of the pigeonhole principle. Since the latter principle is known to require exponential-size bounded-depth Frege proofs, it follows that the propositional version of the matrix principle also requires bounded-depth Frege proofs of exponential size.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  39
    Weak theories of linear algebra.Neil Thapen & Michael Soltys - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (2):195-208.
    We investigate the theories of linear algebra, which were originally defined to study the question of whether commutativity of matrix inverses has polysize Frege proofs. We give sentences separating quantified versions of these theories, and define a fragment in which we can interpret a weak theory V 1 of bounded arithmetic and carry out polynomial time reasoning about matrices - for example, we can formalize the Gaussian elimination algorithm. We show that, even if we restrict our language, proves the commutativity (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  40
    Proving properties of matrices over \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathbb{Z}_{2}}$$\end{document}. [REVIEW]Michael Soltys - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):535-551.
    We prove assorted properties of matrices over \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathbb{Z}_{2}}$$\end{document}, and outline the complexity of the concepts required to prove these properties. The goal of this line of research is to establish the proof complexity of matrix algebra. It also presents a different approach to linear algebra: one that is formal, consisting in algebraic manipulations according to the axioms of a ring, rather than the traditional semantic approach via linear transformations.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark