In the space of four years, from 1826 to 1829, the Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal published three anonymous articles seemingly advocating doctrines inspired by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. Decades of scholarship have initially attributed the most outspoken of the three articles, the 1826 “Observations on the Nature and Importance of Geology,” to Robert Grant, and subsequently to Robert Jameson, thanks to a critical reassessment by James Secord. More recently, scholars have also ascribed to Jameson an article published in 1829, “Of the Continuity (...) of the Animal Kingdom by Means of Generation from the First Ages of the World to the Present Times.” A third short contribution, the 1827 “Of the Changes which Life has Experienced on the Globe” has been credited to the Franco-German Ami Boué. Research undertaken over several years has led to the identification of the three authors hiding behind the veil of anonymity. They were not the ones scholars have agreed upon, nor were they really “Lamarckians.” The discussion of the ways in which the three texts reached Edinburgh broadens our understanding of the daily working practices of contemporary periodicals and of the networks of circulation of texts at the Continental level. Finally, when considered within their proper conceptual and social context, the three articles throw light on the many ways in which, during the 1820s, European amateurs, naturalists, and journalists debated the succession of life forms throughout the history of the Earth. (shrink)

Etude consacrée à Lamarck, au lamarckisme et à son importance dans l'histoire de la biologie et des sciences humaines.

Dans L’Origine des espèces, Darwin avait soigneusement évité de traiter la question de la place des êtres humains dans sa théorie et dans le monde animal : il n’avait pourtant pu éviter que la question fût en tête des préoccupations de la plupart de ses premiers commentateurs. Dans La descendance de l’homme (1871), il prit la parole. Darwin y avance l’idée que les prérogatives sensorielles et, plus largement, intellectuelles et morales dont fait preuve l’Homme, y compris l’appréciation esthétique de la (...) « beauté », sont partagées par bon nombre d’espèces animales. Il soutient la thèse que la sélection sexuelle, ou la lutte pour la procréation, est responsable des différences entre femelles et mâles. Pour lui, la sélection sexuelle est aussi la cause de comportements complexes qui, chez l’homme, sont probablement à l’origine de la formation de groupes humains, appelées races, et du développement des cultures. Darwin le scientifique et Darwin le mâle victorien animent une discussion, où les préjugés de genre et l’orgueil impérial trouvent toute leur place. (shrink)

Lack of consideration of the complex European scientific scene from the late 18th century to the mid-decades of the 19th century has produced partial and often biased reconstructions of priorities, worries, implicit and explicit philosophical and at times political agendas characterizing the early debates on species. It is the purpose of this paper firstly to critically assess some significant attempts at broadening the historiographic horizon concerning the immediate context to Darwin's intellectual enterprise, and to devote the second part to arguing (...) that a multi-faceted European debate on the transformation of life forms had already occurred in Europe around 1800. Of this debate, contrary to long cherished views, Lamarck's was only one voice, amongst many. Naturalists active in different national contexts elaborated solutions and proposed doctrines that shared several viewpoints, yet clearly stemmed from a variety of disciplinary traditions and problematic contexts. (shrink)