Dialogical Nursing Ethics: the Quality of Freedom Restrictions

Nursing Ethics 15 (6):789-802 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article deals with the question of how ethicists respond to practical moral problems emerging in health care practices. Do they remain distanced, taking on the role of an expert, or do they become engaged with nurses and other participants in practice and jointly develop contextualized insights about good care? A basic assumption of dialogical ethics entails that the definition of good care and what it means to be a good nurse is a collaborative product of ongoing dialogues among various stakeholders engaged in the practice. This article discusses the value of a dialogical approach to ethics by drawing on the work of various nursing scholars. We present a case example concerning the quality of freedom restrictions for intellectually disabled people. Issues for discussion include the role and required competences of the ethicist and dealing with asymmetrical relationships between stakeholders

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The task of nursing ethics.K. M. Melia - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):7-11.
The Ground of Dialogical Bioethics.Abraham Rudnick - 2002 - Health Care Analysis 10 (4):391-402.
Care as a Moral Attitude in Nursing.C. Gastmans - 1999 - Nursing Ethics 6 (3):214-223.
Ethical practice in end-of-life care in Japan.Shigeko Izumi - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (4):457-468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
22 (#712,914)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guy Widdershoven
VU University Amsterdam

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references