Response to: increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it

Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (6):372-373 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I read Dr Cherniack’s article regarding do not resuscitate orders with interest.1 One of the problems with DNR orders is the patients’ assumption that if there is no DNR order they will survive resuscitative efforts. This of course is far from the truth. In my hospital these orders have been modified to “do not attempt to resuscitate” orders. One cannot be truly autonomous without being informed. Long term survival, as measured only by being alive, following inhouse cardiac arrest, is about 15% over all age groups.2 In sick elderly patients over 70 years of age who survive a cardiac arrest, the subsequent hospital mortality approaches 100%. This fact, and concerns about harm, influence physicians’ attitudes, …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scale of levels of care versus DNR orders.D. Vanpee - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):351-352.
Comparing DNR and WWKL.Klaus Ambos-Spies, Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen, Steffen Lempp & Theodore A. Slaman - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (4):1089-1104.
On legal order: Some criticism of the received view. [REVIEW]Riccardo Guastini - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
88 (#194,791)

6 months
26 (#114,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?