Argumentos contra la persona y conflictos de intereses

In Gustavo Arroyo, Omar Vásquez Dávila & Soledad Rodríguez (eds.), VI Jornadas de Lógica y Argumentación. Buenos Aires: UNGS. pp. 148-55 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I study the relation between arguments against the person (aka ad hominem or personal attack arguments) and disqualifications for conflicts of interests. I show that both types of arguments share a similar logical structure and that they can be considered to be acceptable in similar circumstances.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.
Naturalizing Logic: a case study of the ad hominem and implicit bias.Madeleine Ransom - 2019 - In Dov Gabbay, Lorenzo Magnani, Woosuk Park & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (eds.), Natural Arguments: A Tribute to John Woods. London: College Publications. pp. 575-589.
Equivocating the ad hominem.Daniel Putman - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):551-555.
Lightening up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy.Kevin Korb - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):41-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-29

Downloads
316 (#64,825)

6 months
80 (#60,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luis F. Bartolo Alegre
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ad Hominem Arguments.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University Alabama Press.
Fallacies.Hans Hansen - 2015 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references