Abortion rates: Is a rough estimate better than no estimate at all?

Bioethics Research Notes 24 (2):32 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alstin, Zac Conventional wisdom teaches that prohibition is counter-productive. We are all familiar with the idea that making something illegal - whether it be drug abuse, alcohol consumption, or abortion - merely 'drives it underground'. Abortion is indeed one of the most potent examples, with the spectre of 'backyard abortion' haunting any talk of restricting abortion access. On a global scale the term 'unsafe abortion' serves the same purpose - reinforcing the idea that unless abortion is made safe, legal, and easy to access, women will resort to abortion practices that are intrinsically unsafe.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
Chemical Abortion in Australia.Marcia Riordan - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.
Unscathed?: Abortion and mental health.Gregory K. Pike - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (4):63.
The other abortion myth—the failure of the common law.Kate Gleeson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):69-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-27

Downloads
44 (#363,319)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references