Reply to Cartwright

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):499-500 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am afraid that Nancy Cartwright and I will have to agree to disagree, on the whole. If my review comes through as harsh, it is perhaps the natural response of a quantum theorist who has worked in economics to a book in which physics and economics are treated as epistemically identical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Anderson.Nancy Cartwright - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):495-497.
Reply.Nancy Cartwright - 2002 - Philosophical Books 43: 271–278.
Cartwright on laws and composition.David Spurrett - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):253 – 268.
Reply to Cartwright.W. P. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):499-500.
Cartwright and Otte on Simpson's paradox.Ellery Eells - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):233-243.
Reply to Eells, Humphreys and Morrison.Review author[S.]: Nancy Cartwright - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):177-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-01

Downloads
84 (#202,393)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson.Stephen L. Adler - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):135-142.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references