Carnap versus Godel: On Syntax and Tolerance

Abstract

One thing we have found out about logical empiricism, now that people are examining it more closely again, is that it was more a framework for a number of related views than a single doctrine. The pluralism of different approaches among various adherents to the Vienna and Berlin groups has been much emphasized. Some have gone so far as to suggest that the kind of speculative philosophy now often called "continental" (including, say, phenomenology) can be seen as falling within the framework of views shared by the Vienna Circle. Much is made of Felix Kaufmann's membership in the Vienna Circle, for instance, or of its "Austrian" roots in the phenomenology of Brentano.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Carnap, the principle of tolerance, and empiricism.Robert Hudson - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):341-358.
The logical syntax of language.Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - London,: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & co.. Edited by Amethe Smeaton.
Tolerance, intuition, and empiricism.Michael Friedman - 2009 - In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 236--249.
Carnap, formalism, and informal rigour.Gregory Lavers - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
55 (#292,062)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

A. W. Carus
Cambridge University
Steve Awodey
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

Vienna circle.Thomas Uebel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references