Improving Fairness in Coverage Decisions: Appearance or Reality?

American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):110-112 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is good for people to understand their insurance coverage and the reasoning that has shaped it, to be able to contribute their two cents if they want to, and to know that their plan has at least attempted to make decisons that are consistent, fair and compassionate. It is also good for them to be told that attention to cost is ethically required. Nevertheless, while following the recommendations of Wynia et al (2004) might make benefits design and administration appear more fair, it will not do as much as they suggest for them to be more fair.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The argument from illusion: All appearance and no reality.S. V. Bokil - 2005 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1-2):147-158.
Distinguishing the Appearance from the Reality of Pain.Kevin Reuter - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (9-10):94-109.
Social responsibility in covering community: A narrative case analysis.Kristie Bunton - 1998 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (4):232 – 246.
Ow! The Paradox of Pain.Christopher S. Hill - 2005 - In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.
Phenomenology: Basing Knowledge on Appearance.Avi Sion - 2003 - Geneva, Switzerland: CreateSpace & Kindle; Lulu..
Fairness in the selection of employees.Richard D. Arvey & Gary L. Renz - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):331-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
11 (#1,144,917)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?