The Invention of Madness by Emily Baum: Reply by the author

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 79:101206 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Grim news for an unoriginal position: a reply to Seth Baum.D. Benatar - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):328-329.
Reflections on madness, modernity, and the futures of global psychiatric history.Emily Baum - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences:101206.
Neither Donkey nor Horse.Emily Baum - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:108-111.
What Is Thought?Eric B. Baum - 2004 - Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.
Descartes, Madness and Method: A Reply to Ablondi.David Scott - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):153-171.
The Many vs. the Few Reply.Emily Largent & Norman Daniels - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (5):8-9.
Nationalism, Religion, and Ethics.Gregory Baum - 2001 - McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP.
Manfred Baum.Manfred Baum - 2005 - Cogito 41:31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-04

Downloads
33 (#486,491)

6 months
8 (#367,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references